Which Technology and Which Democracy? He further posits that McWorld could ultimately win the “struggle”. Barber’s quarrel should be directed not at the imagined antidemocratic nature of the corporation but at its actual democratic nature. He sees both Jihad and McWorld as threats to this system, Jihad because it represents a cultural sectarianism “rooted in race” which: Reports that American cultural imperialism has enforced a Pax McDonald’s turn out to be greatly exaggerated.

All these, and the absolute power of money over everything, even over utilities that used to be seen as the state’s responsibility, conspire to make “democracy” an almost meaningless concept these days. We must restore the nuclear family, by making divorce more difficult, marriage more attractive, child rearing easier, etc. All of these errors are especially disappointing because, though he is very imprecise about solutions, he is very nearly right about threat that McWorld poses, not to democracy, but to our culture. These local value added economies were reasonable success stories and the world should have taken notice that there was something good about this approach. Barber believes, nearly all of these measures involve reducing the role and importance of government in our lives.

And who are those stockholders?

I told you so

In economics, too many things play out differently in different places. All of these errors are especially disappointing because, though he is very imprecise about solutions, he is very nearly right about threat that McWorld poses, not to democracy, but to our culture.

Against this is the argument of ob like Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, railing against the “wave of atheism and lewdness” rolling over Egypt in the s.

essay on jihad vs mcworld

Lechner and John Boli. There was no historical reference for any of this. David Gergen, editor at large of U. After WW2, the victors were more mature and used things like the Marshall Ob to rebuild the local economies in Japan and Europe. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The information-technology of globalization has opened up communications to people all over the world, allowing us to exchange information.


Globalizing Democracy Benjamin R. The League of Nations ganged up on Germany and that evolved into totalitarism going wild.

Review: Jihad vs McWorld by Benjamin R Barber | Books | The Guardian

Barber’s prognosis in Jihad vs McWorld is generally negative—he concludes that neither global corporations nor traditional cultures are supportive of democracy. For more information see Tapart News and Art that Talks at http: You might take issue with the two-page preface to the British ezsay.

Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Even if we set aside the issue of whether Man is naturally greedy or altruistic, we still have to question Mr. But, at any rate, Mr. Instead cs thinking global and acting local in a reasonable fashion- step by step- all of sudden the world was rushed into a new world order that has no basis in history.

Just as size and power did not make for efficient and successful governments, it has not made for efficient and successful essat. In the long run, Jihad and McWorld are not the threats to democracy that Mr.

essay on jihad vs mcworld

Barber is less concerned with the clash between these two systems than he is with the clash between each of them and the participatory democracy that he thinks we should have instead of either. He points out that Islam has no word for “democracy” and has to use the Greek term.

For instance, cutting down a jungle will upset the overall oxygen balance, which affects our “global lungs”. The working poor classes are now finding out that they can no longer even afford to buy the cheaper imports while the destitute working classes who make the products can not afford to buy the very things they make let alone have any money left jjhad to buy the things the USA and other nations have left to sell.


Here again we run into one of the ways in which Mr. More than just economic, the crises that arise from these confrontations often take on a sacred quality to the tribal elements; thus Barber’s use of the term “Jihad” although mcworlr the second edition, he expresses regret at having used that term.

Due to globalization, our market has expanded and is vulnerable to the transnational markets where free trade, easy access to banking and exchange of currency are available. The net result was a terrible loss of local value added economies that supported the geopolitical settings. He mcworlf so because he thinks that the peoples of Jihad are at least likely to be actively involved in their cultures, while the people of McWorld have become nothing more than passive consumers.

I continue to believe that Britain has discovered at least one part of the secret of how to elude both Jihad and McWorld, and recreate in the global arena the tradition of rebellion and liberty, of democracy and the limits on democracy, that has fashioned its own liberal tradition.

Barber is correct that the McWorld we saw ourselves rapidly becoming in the s was unlovely, but the fault lay with us, pn American citizens, not with essay dastardly multinational conglomerates.

Barber states that neither Jihad nor McWorld needs or promotes democracy. However, instead of any real successes, the USA suffered the most massive dislocation of jobs in its history.